Scrums.com Partners with Windsurf to Orchestrate AI

How Scrums.com's Spex Power Delivery

Scrums.com Editorial Team

October 17, 2025

•

10 mins

Share this post

How Scrums.com's Culture Powers Software Delivery

Most software development teams operate with values that live on a poster somewhere. Nice sentiment. Zero impact.

At Scrums.com, we do it differently. Our eight spex aren't motivational wall art; they're operational principles that shape how we hire, how we build, how we collaborate with clients, and ultimately, how we deliver results. When a development team moves fast and stays accountable, when they balance urgency with care, when they adapt without losing focus; that's our spex in action.

For CTOs, engineering leaders, and scaling companies, this matters more than you might think. Culture isn't a nice-to-have; it's infrastructure. It determines whether your team ships features that matter or just ships features. It's the difference between burnout velocity and sustainable performance. It's how the best teams compound their advantage over time.

This isn't a generic guide to "building culture." We're walking through Scrums.com's actual spex,the eight principles that guide everything we do, and showing you how they translate directly into better software delivery, faster time-to-value, and teams that actually want to work together.

Why Spex Matter More Than You Think

Culture gets dismissed as soft. Until it isn't.

When a sprint goes sideways, culture determines whether your team panics, cuts corners silently, and ships debt; or escalates clearly, problem-solves collaboratively, and keeps the client in the loop. When a deadline tightens, culture determines whether people burn out chasing perfection or move intelligently to ship what matters. When priorities shift mid-project, culture determines whether the team fragments or pivots as one unit.

The teams that consistently outdeliver competitors don't have better tools or shinier frameworks. They have shared principles that make their decisions clear and obvious. No endless debates about "what should we do here?" The spex answer it. This creates velocity without chaos, urgency without toxicity, and focus without micromanagement.

For organizations scaling development, whether building internal teams or partnering with external providers, spex-powered teams reduce friction at every layer; sprint planning becomes clearer, communication becomes tighter, problem-solving becomes faster, and accountability becomes mutual rather than hierarchical.

Good to know: The best development teams we've worked with across enterprises and scale-ups share this pattern. They're explicit about their operating principles. They hire for values-alignment as rigorously as skill-match. And their delivery metrics reflect it: lower rework, faster onboarding, higher retention, better sprint predictability.

#Blitz: Speed Without Recklessness

"We play fast; we play hard. Speed is in our DNA, we'd rather make bold moves and adjust on the fly than stand still chasing perfection."

This is not "move fast and break things." It's move fast and learn things.

Blitz means understanding that perfect plans are a myth. The client's requirements will shift. The market will change. Your technical assumptions will be wrong. So instead of spending six weeks planning for a future you can't predict, you ship a meaningful slice in two weeks, gather real feedback, and course-correct with actual data rather than theoretical concerns.

For development teams, this means:

Rapid iteration cycles. Two-week sprints where each cycle ships something the client can evaluate, not just internal progress that looks good in a status meeting. This keeps momentum and surfaces problems early, when they're cheaper to fix.

Decision-making velocity. When options are genuinely close (80/20 trade-offs), good teams make the call and move forward rather than endlessly deliberating. This is where spex matter: everyone agrees that "good shipped in two weeks beats perfect shipped in six."

Calculated risk-taking. Not reckless gambling. Understanding that the cost of being slightly wrong and course-correcting is often lower than the cost of analysis paralysis. A 90% solution shipped on time generates better outcomes than a 98% solution shipped late.

Pro tip: The teams that nail Blitz have one thing in common: they separate "ship it" decisions from "design it" decisions. They'll push hard on architectural decisions that matter long-term. They'll move fast on features that can iterate. This distinction prevents both analysis paralysis and technical debt spirals.

#Partnership: Alignment Creates Accountability

"We're in this together, teammates on and off the field. Our clients aren't just customers; they're part of the squad."

This is the antidote to vendor relationships where you hand off specs and wait for delivery.

Partnership means the client isn't reviewing from a distance; they're integrated into the team. It means transparency: they see sprint progress in real-time, not in monthly reports. It means shared risk: when problems surface, they're solved together, not escalated and delayed. It means the success metric is the client's business outcome, not lines of code delivered or tasks marked complete.

When this principle is real, not just rhetoric, it changes everything:

Onboarding becomes collaborative. Instead of "here's your project plan, execute," it's "here's what we learned about your business in week one, does this shift our direction?" The client feels heard early, decisions are better-informed, and misalignment surfaces before it becomes expensive.

Sprint rituals become mutual. Stand-ups include the client stakeholder. Sprint reviews are joint assessments of progress toward their goals, not our tasks. Retrospectives include their feedback on how we're working together. This creates early warning systems for problems most teams never see until delivery.

Risk becomes shared accountability. When something's going to slip, it's flagged early with the client, options are discussed collaboratively, and the decision is made together. No surprises. No blame-shifting. This builds trust even when problems happen, because they're handled as a team.

Important: Partnership requires discipline. It means saying "no" when the client asks for something misaligned with their own goals. It means having the hard conversation about scope creep. It means the client relationship is professional, not transactional. Teams that skip this create chaos, because "together" without boundaries isn't partnership; it's dysfunction.

#Sorted: Cutting Through Complexity

"No fuss, no frills, just results. We focus on getting the job done, no matter how tricky the play."

Most development environments are unnecessarily complicated. Too many tools. Too many processes. Too many people in meetings deciding what color the button should be.

Sorted means stripping away the noise and focusing on signal. It means asking "does this serve our actual goal?" about every process, tool, and ritual. It means saying "we don't need that" even when it sounds professional or standard. It means ruthlessly prioritizing what matters.

In practice, Sorted looks like:

Streamlined process. Not "no process", the opposite. Clear sprint structure, defined decision-making authority, transparent communication channels. The process serves the work; the work doesn't serve the process. When you have to ask "who decides this?" or "what's our process here?", the system has failed.

Tool minimalism. One source of truth for requirements. One sprint tracking system. One communication channel that's primary. Not five tools doing overlapping things, requiring everyone to maintain status in multiple places and context-switching between platforms.

Meeting discipline. Meetings have agendas and decision authorities. Stand-ups are 15 minutes maximum. Sprint reviews are demos, not presentations. Retros are action-oriented, like "here's what we're changing next sprint," not complaint sessions. If you can't state the decision that should come out of a meeting, it shouldn't be scheduled.

Good to know: Sorted teams are also the most empowered teams. When bureaucracy is low, people can actually think. When processes are clear and minimal, they don't spend energy navigating the system; they spend it on the work. The counter-intuitive truth: less process, not more, creates accountability.

#GiveaSh*t: Care as Operational Principle

"Passion is our fuel. We care deeply, think boldly, and aren't afraid to stand our ground."

This isn't about being nice. It's about having skin in the game.

GiveaSh*t means the team actually cares whether the solution works for the client. It means flagging technical debt that will hurt them. It means pushing back on unrealistic timelines because you know it will burn the team out and compromise quality. It means the developer isn't just writing code; they're thinking about the user experience, the business impact, and the maintainability of their own work.

This principle separates teams that deliver software from teams that deliver solutions:

Quality thinking. Not perfectionism. Caring about whether your code solves the actual problem, handles edge cases you've thought through, and is maintainable by the next person who touches it. This drives fewer bugs in production and lower rework costs.

Honest communication. When something isn't working, you say so, not in a complaining way, but in a "here's the problem and here's what I think we should do" way. This means clients hear about risks early, not excuses later.

Ownership mindset. The developer doesn't just complete the ticket; they consider whether it achieved the sprint goal. The tech lead doesn't just code-review; they ask whether this architecture serves the client's long-term needs. This compounds into better decisions at every layer.

Warning: Care without healthy boundaries becomes martyrdom. Teams with high GiveaSh*t but no structure around "reasonable effort" burn out. That's why GiveaSh*t is paired with Sorted (clarity about scope) and Smile (permission to enjoy the work). The spex work together.

#Smile: Sustainability and Trust

"We win together, and we laugh together. Life's too short to work with people who don't bring good vibes."

Burned-out teams deliver worse software over time. They cut corners invisibly. They're fragile; one person leaves and the whole engine falters. They don't attract top talent because word gets out about the culture.

Smile is the principle that acknowledges a simple truth: you currently spend more hours with your team than with your family. If those hours are miserable, the work suffers. Not because fun directly makes better code, but because sustainable teams outpace burned-out ones.

In development environments, this means:

Autonomy within boundaries. People know what they're accountable for and have freedom in how they execute. Not micromanagement dressed up as "alignment." Not chaos dressed up as "flexibility." Structure + freedom = people who show up energized.

Celebrating progress. Not just shipping. Was the sprint delivered on time? That matters. The team shipped three days early? That's worth acknowledging. The tough problem got solved? That's a win. Teams that mark progress grow stronger; teams that only focus on what's next wear down.

No egos, high standards. This is the crucial balance. The team challenges ideas vigorously but doesn't make it personal. Strong opinions loosely held. The goal is the best solution, not whose idea wins. This creates psychological safety, people take risks and speak up, while maintaining performance rigor.

Learn more: Research on high-performing teams (Amy Edmondson's work on psychological safety, Lencioni's work on team dynamics) consistently shows that teams that trust each other and feel safe solving problems together deliver better outcomes and have lower attrition. #Smile isn't soft; it's infrastructure for performance.

#Adapt: Evolution as Competitive Advantage

"The game is always changing, and so are we. Champions don't stick to the same playbook; we evolve, pivot, and grow."

The tech industry moves fast. Client needs can shift. Market conditions change. Your assumptions get proven wrong by reality. Teams that rigidly stick to their original plan get outpaced by teams that stay responsive.

Adapt means building learning into your operating rhythm:

Sprint retrospectives that matter. Not "what went well, what could improve", though that's part of it. Real retros surface systemic issues and lead to changed practices. Did the sprint go poorly? Maybe it's not the team; maybe it's the sprint goal was vague or the estimation was off. That gets fixed next sprint.

Technical adaptation. As you learn more about the problem, your technical approach should evolve. If the framework you chose isn't working, you revisit it. If a pattern is creating more problems than it's solving, you change it. This isn't thrashing; it's learning-driven iteration.

Client feedback loops. You deliver a feature and the client tells you, "That's not quite what I meant." Not a failure, it's data. The team absorbs the feedback and adapts the approach for the next slice. This is why short iteration cycles matter: you adapt quickly, not after six months of building the wrong thing.

Pro tip: Adapt is a strength multiplier when paired with Sorted. Sorted creates enough clarity and stability that you're not constantly changing direction without reason. Adapt means you will change direction when the data supports it, not when the mood shifts. The two together create responsive teams that aren't chaotic.

#Results: Outcomes Over Activity

"We don't play for participation trophies. Growth, impact, and real wins; that's what counts."

This is where everything focuses.

Results means every sprint, every feature, every architectural decision is measured against one question: does this move the needle on what the client actually needs? Not "did we execute the plan?" Results asks "did we achieve the outcome?"

This changes how teams prioritize:

Ruthless scope management. If a feature doesn't move the needle, it gets deprioritized or cut. This is where Sorted and GiveaSh*t enable Results; you have the courage to say "this won't deliver value" and the clarity to know it's the right call.

Early delivery over late perfection. Shipping 80% of a feature that users can evaluate beats shipping 100% of a feature six months later that doesn't match their needs. Results-focused teams ship early, learn from real usage, and iterate based on data.

Measurement discipline. The team defines upfront what success looks like. Not "ship the app", that's activity. Success: "30% of users adopt this feature within 30 days" or "time-to-invoice decreases by 2 days" or "support tickets for this process drop by 40%." When you know what you're measuring, you make smarter decisions.

Important: Results-driven teams aren't ruthless; they're clear. The hard part is defining what "results" actually means at the start of a project. It requires good conversation with the client, rigor in specification, and discipline in planning. Most projects stumble here because "results" never get clearly defined. Teams then ship something technically correct but strategically irrelevant.

#Tech: Technology as Problem-Solver

"Tech is our secret weapon. We believe it can solve big problems, drive change, and shape the future."

Tech itself isn't the spex; caring how it's used is.

Tech means approaching problems with the question "what's the technical solution here?" not "how do I avoid technology?" It means investing in the right tools and platforms, not defaulting to what's familiar. It means staying current with what's possible because yesterday's best practice might be obsolete today. It means treating technology as enabler, not an obstacle.

For development teams, this translates to:

Tool investment. The right CI/CD pipeline saves the team hours every sprint. Good monitoring catches production problems before customers do. Solid infrastructure decisions enable speed without creating maintenance nightmares. This requires saying "yes" to investment in tools that matter.

Staying current. Not for novelty's sake. The team understands new frameworks, languages, and approaches; not to use everything, but to make informed choices. Sometimes the mature, stable tech is the right call. Sometimes the newer approach solves your specific problem better. You can only decide if you're informed.

Technical excellence. Code reviews that raise quality. Testing disciplines that catch problems early. Architecture decisions that enable scaling. This is how teams that care about Tech avoid the trap of "moving fast" becoming "moving recklessly."

Learn more: The best technical teams view their stack and infrastructure decisions as competitive advantages, not necessary evils. Netflix's investment in their platform architecture. Stripe's obsession with API design. These aren't nice-to-haves; they're foundational to how these companies operate at scale.

#Worldclass: Excellence Without Arrogance

"We don't just show up; we set the standard. Proudly South African, globally driven, we bring world-class talent, ambition, and excellence to every challenge."

Worldclass means setting the bar high without needing to talk about it constantly.

It means a code review that's rigorous because we're serious about quality, not because we're gatekeeping. It means hiring people who are genuinely top-tier, not just meeting a headcount goal. It means saying no to mediocre work, not as a critique, but as a standard. It means your portfolio of work speaks for itself.

What makes this spex operational:

Hiring rigor. You only bring people onto teams who meet the standard. This isn't elitism; it's respect, for the client, for the existing team members, for the work itself. When everyone is performing at a high level, the whole team elevates.

Work that proves it. Worldclass teams' work speaks louder than their words. The technical decisions make sense. The user experience is thoughtful. The architecture scales. Clients notice this and want to work with them again.

Continuous learning. People on worldclass teams are reading, experimenting, attending conferences, building in public. This raises the bar organically. You're surrounded by people who care about excellence, so mediocrity isn't an option.

Good to know: Worldclass is particularly powerful paired with Partnership and GiveaSh*t. You're setting a high bar for the client's benefit, not to be precious about quality. You're learning and growing to serve them better. The standard-setting is in service of outcomes, not ego.

How Our Spex Change Results

When these eight principles work together, not as individual values but as an operating system, something shifts.

Blitz + Sorted + Adapt = fast teams that aren't chaotic. They move with purpose, not anxiety.

Partnership + GiveaSh*t + Results = client alignment that actually delivers what's needed. There's no disconnect between what the team ships and what the client wanted.

Smile + Worldclass + Tech = teams that are both sustainable and excellent. People want to work there. They grow. The work compounds over time.

The result? Teams that consistently outdeliver: faster time-to-value, lower rework, better retention, higher sprint predictability. Not because they're superhuman. Because they operate with clear principles that make good decisions obvious.

When to Partner with Spex-Powered Teams

For organizations scaling software delivery, whether building internal teams or scaling with external partners, alignment around these principles matters more than most realize.

You can outsource code. You can't outsource culture. But you can partner with teams whose culture is explicitly aligned with yours.

This is where Scrums.com's approach differs from typical staff augmentation or dedicated team models. We're not just providing developers; we're deploying teams that operate according to clear principles: Blitz, Partnership, Sorted, GiveaSh*t, Smile, Adapt, Result, Tech, and Worldclass.

This means:

Faster integration. New teams don't need six weeks to understand "how we work here." The principles are explicit and operational. Developers onboard into a system that's already clear.

Aligned problem-solving. When issues surface, the team's default response is shaped by these spex. A production issue at 3am? The team (and Scrums.com support) moves in Blitz mode with Partnership discipline, clear communication, rapid response, and collaborative fixes.

Predictable delivery. Because every sprint is structured around Result, measured against Adapted learning, executed with Sorted discipline, the delivery becomes reliable. Not because we're fortune tellers, because we're systematic.

Real-time visibility. Partnership and Tech combine to give you actual insight into progress. Not status reports; live dashboards, sprint metrics, and honest communication about what's on track and what needs attention.

Learning-driven scaling. As your needs evolve, teams Adapt. Skills shift, tech stacks evolve, the engagement model scales up or down. This isn't vendor lock-in; it's a partnership that evolves with you.

This model particularly suits organizations with ambitious delivery goals, scaling needs, and CTOs or engineering leaders who care about how work gets done, not just that it gets done.

Conclusion

Operating with our spex isn't a methodology. It's not a process you can buy. It's a commitment to principles that make good decisions obvious and excellence non-negotiable.

The teams that win aren't winning because they have better tools or shinier frameworks. They're winning because they've made a choice: these are our principles, we hire for them, we make decisions against them, and we evolve based on real feedback. This creates a compounding advantage; stronger decisions lead to better delivery, which attracts better people, which deepens the culture, which enables even stronger decisions.

Whether you're building internal teams or scaling with external partners, this framework matters. The question isn't whether culture matters; it obviously does. The question is whether you're explicit about it and whether the people executing your work actually embody those principles or just nod along.

Ready to scale with a software development company that is run by these spex? Discover how Scrums.com's operationalized culture and AI-enabled software engineering orchestration platform (SEOP) deliver both velocity and reliability. Explore our custom software development and dedicated team models, built on principles that actually drive results.